Actuarium

Interactive workers' comp pricing model

Edit exposures, losses, trend, and expenses to build a live rate indication — the same build-up as the Granite State Mutual case study, fully editable and wired straight into the Decision Studio — or load a real Schedule P workers' comp dataset below.

Interactive WC pricing model

Edit exposures, losses, trend and expenses to build a live rate indication for a workers' comp book, defaulted to the Granite State Mutual case study.

Real data: load a Schedule P dataset

Replace the illustrative Granite State Mutual experience above with a real workers' comp triangle from the CAS Loss Reserve Database (NAIC Schedule P, 1988–1997).

Guided walkthrough

Select a real Schedule P workers' comp dataset and basis, then load it into the model.

YearPayroll ($M)Earned premium ($000)Rate change %On-level factorExp. weight
2017
0.980
2018
0.960
2019
0.950
2020
0.970
2021
0.980
2022
0.990
2023
1.000
2024
1.000

Class codes

ClassDescriptionPayroll ($M)Current rate/100Expected loss rate/100
8810Clerical office employees
5645Carpentry — dwellings
8380Automobile service / repair
7380Drivers & chauffeurs
9079Restaurant employees (incl. wait staff)

Assumptions & limitations
  • A single blended pure-premium trend (frequency × severity) applies uniformly across all loss dollars over the trend period.
  • Large-loss capping is a simplified per-claim proxy (cap × claim count) rather than a full excess-layer simulation.
  • Experience-period weights determine both the weighted loss ratio and the credibility claim-count base; adjust them to reflect which years you trust.
  • The class rate review caps indicated relativity swings at the selected ± percentage per review cycle, per standard rate-shock management practice.
  • This tool is an educational illustration built on the Granite State Mutual synthetic case study, not a real filing.
Ask the tutor