Life Contingencies Primer
On this page
Although life contingencies is primarily SOA territory, P&C actuaries encounter it in workers' compensation lifetime pension claims, structured settlements, and any product with mortality-contingent cash flows. This primer covers survival models, life tables, and the present-value building blocks.
Survival models
Let be the age at death, with survival function . For a life aged , the future lifetime has survival function
The force of mortality is the instantaneous death rate, analogous to a hazard rate; it relates to the survival function via . Common parametric laws: Gompertz (), Makeham (, adding an age-independent "accident" component โ of particular relevance to WC lifetime claims, which combine an accidental-death-like flat hazard with normal aging mortality).
Life tables
A life table tabulates , the expected number of survivors to age out of an initial cohort (e.g., 100,000), from which (one-year mortality rate) and follow directly. Standard tables include the SOA's Annuity 2000/2012 tables and the widely used CSO (Commissioners Standard Ordinary) tables for U.S. life insurance valuation. For WC lifetime pension reserves, actuaries often start from a general population table and adjust for the impairment associated with the disabling injury.
Present values of insurances and annuities
A whole life insurance pays $1 at the moment of death (or end of year of death, for the discrete version); its expected present value is
A whole life annuity-due pays $1 at the start of each year the insured survives:
These satisfy the fundamental identity (where ), which follows from the fact that a $1 whole life insurance plus the annuity of premiums funding it must reproduce the accumulation of $1. Term and endowment insurances and annuities restrict the payment to a fixed term , e.g. (term insurance, pays only on death within years) and (endowment, pays on death within years or survival to ).
Worked example
Using a simplified table: , , , and (). Compute the EPV of a 3-year term insurance paying $100,000 at the end of the year of death for a life aged 60.
. . .
| PV of $100,000 benefit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.000000 | 0.010 | 0.010000 | 0.952381 | 952.38 |
| 1 | 0.990000 | 0.012 | 0.011880 | 0.907029 | 1,077.55 |
| 2 | 0.978120 | 0.014 | 0.013694 | 0.863838 | 1,183.20 |
Sum of the deferred death probabilities times discount $100,000 gives:
So the expected present value of the 3-year term benefit is $3,213 per $100,000 of coverage โ the building block for pricing structured settlement annuities or reserving lifetime WC pensions with mortality contingency.
Pitfalls
- Applying a generic population mortality table to an impaired-life WC pensioner without an appropriate mortality improvement/impairment adjustment, materially mis-stating reserves.
- Ignoring mortality improvement over time โ static tables understate future survival, understating long-duration annuity liabilities.
- Confusing curtate (discrete, end-of-year) and continuous (moment-of-death) formulations, which differ by an approximate factor related to .
- Treating interest and mortality as independent when they are not in reality (e.g., pandemic years shift both economic and mortality assumptions together) โ scenario/stress testing should consider joint shocks.
Exam relevance
This material is the foundation of SOA Exams FAM and ALTAM/ASTAM; P&C actuaries need only the conceptual core for CAS Exam 7/9 discussions of tabular reserves and structured settlements.
Related
Force of interest, annuities-certain, and duration โ the time-value machinery behind discounted reserves, investment income, and Exam FM/2.
MLE and method of moments, Bayesian estimation, the difference between confidence and credible intervals, and hypothesis testing as actuaries actually use it.
References
- Dickson, Hardy & Waters, Actuarial Mathematics for Life Contingent Risks
- SOA Exam FAM/ALTAM Syllabus
- Bowers et al., Actuarial Mathematics
Want a deeper conversation on this topic?
Ask the agent about this